An associate in London recently commented on his fear of the Islamic infiltration that is taking place in his nation. He also added that he feared them less than his own political leaders. I have no doubt that many here in the U.S. could express much the same fears. Among conservatives the greatest disagreement is on whether our political leaders have sold out to the nations of Islam, the Globalists, the communists, or all three, but of the issue of their selling out, there is little doubt.
Today we can look back on the Second World War and regard it as the good old days. At least we knew who was loyal to whom. That will not be said about World War III.
One of the greatest problems we face today is enemy recognition and that is largely due to an assault on the English language. The meaning of our words have been in many cases reversed. Look at the way that the term Liberals is interchanged with Progressives, and they have nothing in common. Liberals basically want a free lunch from the government and no rules to guide their behavior. Progressives, on the other hand, want ironclad, unyielding rules, and they want to make them.
In 2012 prior to the election, Allen West commented that 78 to 81 members of the Democratic Caucus were communists. Bill Clinton, Progressive, rebuked West with the following comment:
"This is not the 1950's. At least Joe McCarthy could skate on the fact that there were one or two living communists walking around. Nobody's seen a Communist in over a decade!"
Allen West was questioned later if he regretted that remark: Congressman West is well educated in the field of history. His reply:
"No. I don't regret it whatsoever. And I think that if you would take the time to study the political spectrum of ideologies at the turn of the century, American Communists renamed themselves as Progressives. If you study the Woodrow Wilson administration, people referred to the Woodrow Wilson administration as 'a Progressive Administration.'"
Well the Americans of later days wanted nothing to do with the Progressive agenda and so the Progressives dropped that terminology and embraced the word "Liberals". In later years, the sixties, Liberals took on the aspect of the flower power, free love, anti war, and freedom with no restrictions. "You do your thing and I'll do mine."
Still later, people like Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney, as Liberalism was developing a foul odor, once again fell back on the term of Progressives. As a result the two words are often used interchangeably while their ideological difference are vast. Beware the Liberal for he votes Democrat, but beware the Progressive even more as he has plans for controlling your future.
A perfect example of how these two groups rub shoulders and agree on certain issues. Both are opposed to the concept of conservatism and unite in their attack on right wing principles, but the following is an example of how the liberals also resent intrusion on their lives by a Progressive government:
From The Washington Post...
U.S., British intelligence mining data from nine U.S. Internet companies in broad secret program
London's Guardian Newspaper reported Friday that GCHQ, Britain's equivalent of the NSA, also has been secretly gathering intelligence from the same internet companies through an operation set up by the NSA.
Both the Guardian and WaPo are liberal media and neither likes it when Progressives begin snooping into their privacy. Odd, how they have no objections to our privacy being invaded.
Today many are finally convinced that Globalism is becoming a major force in world events and look to the Bilderberg Group as the prime founders of the goals of the NWO. And there they find what seems to be a contradiction, but contradictions do not exist. The question is why the ultra rich of the world would turn against Capitalism, where they made their wealth, and embrace communism, the great destroyer of wealth. The answer is the quest for absolute power over their fellow human beings.
They have more money than they could ever possibly spend in ten lifetimes. Unrestrained power is the only thing left to achieve, and that can exist only under totalitarian rule, i.e.: communism. No religion, no legal restraints, no moral hindrance, nothing to stop them from becoming the lesser gods of the planet Earth.
Their great wealth and in many cases their intelligence could be such a wonderful force for this world, and many might ask why they choose to do evil. Actually, the answer is quite simple and explained in the phrase "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Think about it. We all have a dark side. There are many problems in this world that if we had the power to change them, we would. George Soros is a Jew hating Jew and he seeks the power to destroy Israel, and that can only be done through war. Take a look at the Middle East.
Bill Gates' biggest concern is the over population of the Earth. His agenda is the pursuit of "reproductive health", which is New Think for sterilizing the masses to reduce the population. Click this link, it will take but a second to show you this.
Look at what Mayor Bloomberg is doing to the eating and drinking habits of the people of New York City. Look at what Obama is doing to us and what English Prime Ministers have been doing to England. For that matter, include the leaders of Europe and Scandinavia. All of those nations are being led to their downfall by members of the Elite class with an agenda.
Right in the middle of this whole rule by the Elite program are a billion religious fanatics all too glad to do their fair share of reducing the world's population in the hope that they will rule. They are being manipulated and used by men far brighter than they, all members of an exclusive billionaires club. Everybody wants to change the world, many not for the better.
We Just Can't Seem To Learn From The Past
The Late Great America
The Enemy Is Everywhere
Where Have All The Leaders Gone?